|
| |
Friends,
The following action alert is from FAIR. Please take the time to do
this, as its more important than ever to hold the media accountable. As
always, please update us on the action you take. You can bcc
kcmediawatch@yahoo.com, or email kcmediawatch@yahoo.com to let us know
about any phone calls you made.
Peace,
Mike Murphy
Kansas City Iraq Task Force Media Watch
ACTION ALERT:
Network Viewers Still in the Dark on "Smoking Gun Memo"
Print media continue to downplay story
May 20, 2005
Following FAIR's call for more mainstream coverage of the "smoking gun
memo"--the secret British document containing new evidence that the Bush
administration manipulated intelligence to justify its plan to invade
Iraq--a steady trickle of news reports have appeared. But that coverage
has been downplayed in general and is still completely absent from the
nightly news.
The Los Angeles Times published a page 3 story on the memo on May 12,
and the Washington Post ran a page 18 story the following day. More than
two weeks after the story broke in the Sunday Times of London (5/1/05),
it finally made the front page of a major U.S. newspaper, the Chicago
Tribune (5/17/05).
After referring to the memo (5/2/05) in a story on the British electoral
campaign, the New York Times failed to report on the document's
implications about the Bush administration until today (5/20/05); the
one-column story didn't mention the manipulation of intelligence until
the eighth paragraph. (Times columnist Paul Krugman also discussed the
memo on the paper's opinion page on May 16.)
The Washington Post's ombudsman, Michael Getler, who the previous week
(5/8/05) had mentioned reader complaints about the Post's lack of memo
coverage without evaluating their substance, revisited the issue with a
much more critical eye in his most recent column (5/15/05). (The ombud
gave back-handed credit to FAIR and the group Media Matters for
America--both "self-described media watchdog organizations"--for
prompting him to delve into the story.) Getler wrote that Post editors
initially told him they didn't pursue the story because they were "tied
up with election coverage"--this despite the fact that the leaked memo
became a major election story in Britain and likely contributed to Tony
Blair's weak returns. When he questioned them again after the email
campaign, Getler wrote, "editors agreed that this story should be
covered and said they were going to go back and do that"; the Post's May
13 story followed.
Getler called investigation of the memo's conclusions "journalistically
mandatory" and suggested that the Post story should have been placed on
the front page.
While the memo has begun to get wider coverage in print, broadcasters
have maintained a near silence on the issue. The story has turned up in
a few short CNN segments (Crossfire, 5/13/05; Live Sunday, 5/15/05; Wolf
Blitzer Reports, 5/16/05), but the only mention of the memo FAIR found
on the major broadcast networks came on ABC's Sunday morning show This
Week (5/15/05), in which host George Stephanopoulos questioned Sen. John
McCain about its contents. When McCain declared that he didn't "agree
with it" and defended the Bush administration's decision to go to war,
Stephanopoulos didn't question him further. A look at the nightly news
reveals not a single story aired about the memo and its implications.
When finally questioned by CNN (5/16/05), White House press secretary
Scott McClellan claimed he hadn't seen the memo, but that "the reports"
about it were "flat-out wrong." British government officials, however,
did not dispute the contents of the memo--which can be read in full
online at http://downingstreetmemo.com/ --and a former senior American
official called it "an absolutely accurate description of what
transpired" (Knight Ridder, 5/6/05).
The Chicago Tribune (5/17/05) named several factors that had caused a
"less than robust discussion" of the smoking gun memo: Aside from the
White House's denials, and the media's slow reaction, the paper asserted
that "the public generally seems indifferent to the issue or unwilling
to rehash the bitter prewar debate over the reasons for the war." Of
course, it's hard to judge the public's interest in a story the media
have largely shielded them from.
ACTION:
1. Please contact the nightly news programs and ask them to investigate
and report on the new evidence that the Bush administration manipulated
intelligence to support its plan to invade Iraq.
CONTACT:
ABC World News Tonight
Phone: 212-456-4040
mailto:PeterJennings@abcnews.com
CBS Evening News
Phone: 212-975-3691
mailto:evening@cbsnews.com
NBC Nightly News
Phone: 212-664-4971
mailto:nightly@nbc.com
PBS NewsHour with Jim Lehrer
Phone: 703-739-5000
mailto:newshour@pbs.org
2. Write a brief letter to the editor (up to 150 words)
to letters@kcstar.com or
write Kansas City Star, Letters, 1729 Grand Blvd., KCMO 64108. Include your
name, address and daytime phone number. Or call (816) 234-4497 to leave a
30-second commentary. Leave your name, address and daytime phone number.
3. SPREAD this email to at least 10 of your friends,
relatives or coworkers.
4. Send an email to
kcmediawatch@yahoo.com
to let us know you acted on this alert.
More information:
KEEP INFORMED and ACTIVE. Here are links to update you
on the current crisis:
http://dahrjamailiraq.com/index.php

|